Fox news sunday today youtube
That's about the capabilities we have to hold the Taliban to the commitments that they have voiced directly and the commitments that they have made publicly. And we are working in a united way with dozens of other countries in the international community to ensure that's the case. As far as the U. I understand when you talk about there is pressure we click bring to bear, we have frozen billions of dollars and Afghan assets. There's all kinds of ways we can squeeze them without actually using force. But let me take an example of one member of the Taliban. That's Khalil Haqqani who is the head of security for the Taliban in Kabul. This fellow, Haqqani, he authorized suicide bombings against U. Do you really believe that the kinds of soft power pressure you're talking about is enormous leverage over a zealot like Haqqani?
That's real cold hard cash that matters. Secondly, and probably more importantly, no one is more clear-eyed about who the Taliban are and who the Haqqani network is than the national security professionals that have been working on this issue for the past 20 years. The question is not whether these are good guys or bad guys. We know the answer to that question. The question click whether or not they will ultimately see it as being in fox news sunday today youtube interest to let Americans through.
A lot of people suggested 12 days ago that they wouldn't, that people under the Taliban head of security wouldn't let thousands of Americans have safe passage to the airport and get out. We have evacuated more than 5, Americans in that time. And we intend to ensure that any American who wants to leave Afghanistan at any time will be able to do so. Here was his answer. That it was much wiser to focus on Kabul. And so I followed that recommendation. My question is, instead of laying this off on the generals, shouldn't the commander-in-chief take full responsibility giving -- given that they had to make a decision on Bagram based on the conditions that he set for them? He has expressly said the buck stops with him. But let's be real about Bagram. There is a difference between tactical advice from the commanders on the ground, what is the right operational method of executing a drawdown? And on that, he placed great weight on the advice of the people in the field.
And the strategic decision to continue a war into a third decade with American troops fighting and dying in a civil war in another country. On the strategic decision, that's a decision only a president can make. On the tactical decision of which is the right airport to have for an evacuation, how do i delete my amazon smile account course, any responsible president would give significant weight to the advice of the commanders on the ground.
And their advice was to close Bagram and focus on Kabul. Thanks again. Where does he think we need to go from here? Your reaction? We went there to prevent the Taliban from having a regime that would allow terrorists to reconstitute themselves and hit us again here at home. It's fox news sunday today youtube a total success. If you -- this term "endless war," let's take a look at it. The last seven months, the Afghans have lost more people fighting than we have over 20 years.
They've taken 65, casualties. We've taken roughly 2, in 20 years. The last year and a half we've lost no one. With our continued deployment of 2, people, we were, in effect, keeping the lid on, keeping terrorists from reconstituting, and having a light footprint in the country. The policy was working. Therefore, I think calling it and endless war or claiming fox news sunday today youtube we're somehow trying to get involved in a civil war is - a domestic civil war is simply not accurate. We went over there to protect us here at home. We've not had a mass casualty attack from over there in these 20 years.
I'd call that a successful policy. Now we're looking at the exit and over the next two days our heroic military is doing the best they can with a horrible policy decision. This is one of the worst foreign policy decisions in American history. Much worse than Saigon because after we left Saigon, there weren't Vietnamese terrorists who were planning on attacking us here at home. That we leave behind exactly what we went in to solve 20 years ago. And I fear for the future in continuing the war on terror. You know, just because we decide to quit fighting doesn't mean the terrorists go away. So they're still out there. They're invigorated. They're emboldened and excited about the success they see in bringing America to its knees in Afghanistan.
He's made it clear he's going to do that. Which raises the question, given that reality, how do we get the rest of the Americans and Afghans out of the country? How do we protect ourselves going forward from a terror attack that emanates from Afghanistan, and how do we deal with the Taliban? We will - we'll not have sources on the ground.
The over the horizon attacks, such as was carried out, fox news sunday today youtube, you know, quite limited in effectiveness. And every either American or Afghan ally left behind is either a potential victim or a hostage. Remember the Taliban love taking hostages. They've done this before. It puts us in an extraordinarily difficult position. And also, remember, Afghanistan is landlocked. There's only one way in by air and one way out by air. We don't have sort of friends in the neighborhood that would provide us the kind of intelligence that we would normally get, for example, in Syria or in Africa or in Yemen. So it's going to be extremely difficult. We have very, very little leverage to extract additional Americans or Afghan allies from this landlocked country. You know, you've just heard Jake Sullivan say we have a lot of leverage. And he talked about international pressure, diplomatic pressure, and especially financial pressure because we and some of our western allies have frozen billions of dollars in assets that the Taliban is very much going to need to continue to do business.
Do you not see that as enormous leverage? The Haqqani network and other groups engage in organized crime, basically. They how do i delete my amazon smile account other sources of revenue. And, of course, they're not particularly concerned about international pressure.
These are barbarians who certainly are not motivated by what others may think of them, and they've got the neighboring countries that have actually been sympathetic to them. The Fox news sunday today youtube government has always been somewhat sympathetic to them. So they've got kind of a friendly neighbor as well. So we have little or no leverage to get our people out or our allies. You know one thing I think that's been really encouraging is to see the American veterans wo have come back from over there working with their former interpreters, communicating with them, trying to get them back to the airport to get out of there. The American veterans, we've heard from many of them in my state, and I know other members of Congress have -- have been working overnight trying to get their friends and allies out of that country.
It's been quite inspiring to see all of these veterans pitching in and trying to help their former colleagues. You've been very consistent. You opposed it when Donald Trump started the process. You opposed it when Joe Biden continue the process. And back click to see more he announced that, yes, in April, he said, I'm going to get everybody out by the end of August, you noted the fact, as you did today, that for more than a year not a single American had been killed in combat in Afghanistan.
President Biden was asked about that this week and he pointed out the fact that they didn't attack us after Donald Trump had made the deal that all of Americans were going to get out. Take a look at what the president had to say. If in April he fox news sunday today youtube said, hey, the Trump deal is off, we're staying in and, in fact, we're going to beef up the number of troops, he contends we'd have been back in a full-scale war with the Taliban, and, unfortunately taking a lot of casualties.
Once again the president's off the mark. We hadn't lost as many as 13people, which we lost Thursday, in any of the last four years. In fact, our casualties since have been quite modest, quite modest. We lost more - I repeat - more of our military personnel last Thursday then we lost in any one of the last four years.
So the balance has been dramatically reduced for American personnel. Remember, in the whole war, Chris, we have regretfully lost a couple of thousand of our people. We -- that's very regretful. But the Fox news sunday today youtube have lost 65, They have been fighting and we've been in the background helping them with counterterrorism and the ongoing training of the military. The policy was working if you remember why we went there, https://ampeblumenau.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/archive/puzzle/whats-going-on-with-facebook-and-instagram.php was to keep the Taliban out and the terrorists from being able to operate with impunity so they could attack us again here at home.
I want to ask you one question on another subject. You've even taken some of your campaign funds to do a public service announcement. The highest number of new COVID cases right now are in Florida and Texas, where two Republican governors have banned mask mandates in schools and other places. Do you think that Governor DeSantis and Governor Abbott are making a mistake banning individual institutions, school districts, from imposing mask mandates? MCCONNELL: You know, I'm kind of reluctant to give governors advice about how they ought to carry out their responsibilities during the pandemic, but I do think it's important to remember that 90 percent of the people in the hospitals are unvaccinated. So the answer to this is get vaccinated. If we could keep saying that over and over and over again, I think that's the key to this.
This is a crisis among unvaccinated Americans who seem to be reluctant to believe that vaccination works. It does. Thanks for your time this Sunday. It's always good to talk with you, sir.
What we should be worried about is the programs we deliver so people can reenter the workforce and that children don't drink poison water at school and in their homes. And remember, this is really not about politics or process. What is at stake here? If Congress fails to pass both the infrastructure package and the social spending package, what's at stake link terms of the Biden presidency and the fortunes for the Democrats in the midterms?
He's worried about delivering for the people. And that's what we're focused on. We're going to keep our head down and we're going to deliver. We're going learn more here lower prescription drug cost. People can't get their drugs at the fox news sunday today youtube of the month to save their lives. So, this is not about politics. This fox news sunday today youtube about delivering for people, and this president's desire to make sure that he empowers his families to reach their destiny. Richmond, thank you. Thanks for your time today. Always good to talk with you, sir. And here's how the head of your Progressive Caucus, how she reacted to that.
Take a look. Like we are going to have to come down in our number and we're going to have to do that work. So we're going to get to work and see what we can get to. How do you get down to that lower fox news sunday today youtube Because there are two ways. One is that you push forward fewer proposals but back them more fully, or you keep all of the proposals but you give them sunset dates which, as we both know, is an old D. He's going to bring all of the stakeholders together. And I trust his judgment to get a compromise. Let me just put one thing in perspective. His vision was cut taxes to grow the economy. And we had overseas wars. We have a different vision. We do want to spend money, invest to grow the economy.
We believe that investing in the American people in a modern economy is the way to grow -- to growth. And that's our vision. One of them, Joe Manchin -- actually, two of them Joe Manchin has talked about. One is means testing. Instead of giving these benefits to everyone regardless of income level, say they either -- they phase out, gets lower and eventually are cut off for people above a certain income level. There's also talk that, which is not included in current ideas, for a work requirement for people getting those -- that child tax credit. What do you think about those as ways to target these benefits to people? If we are talking about a child tax credit, that's already phased out, Earned Income Tax Credit that's already phased.
But there are some things, Chris, that we have to do together as Americans. I mean, should we really have segregated classes in public school? When I went to first grade, you had blue collar kids there, you had rich kids there. So when we're talking about having every American get the fox news sunday today youtube to have preschool, which they already have in countries like France, I don't think that ought to be means-tested.
And we're talking about everyone should get to go to some community college because they're going to need skills for the 21st Century. Senator Manchin says we have 11 million jobs that are unfilled. How are we going to get people credentialed? I don't think fox news sunday today youtube should be means- tested. And in terms of the senator's proposal, I think we can compromise on what does require means-testing and what doesn't. I've been down to Beckley, Check this out Virginia. He was deeply gracious. He cares deeply about his state. He, frankly, has has always been transparent. We disagree, but he has been clear about what his views are and I think we can come to an agreement.
But he is a straight shooter. Let's talk about something that he has shot straight about. He says that this social spending program needs to come down dramatically. And here was something he said this week, take a look. God bless them. And all they need to do is we have to elect more, I guess, for them to get theirs, elect more liberals. Because one of the things he's basically saying is, look, you fox news sunday today youtube have a mandate, Joe Biden didn't have a mandate, the Democrats in Congress didn't have a mandate for this kind of enormous social spending. And here's what I would say to Senator Manchin having been to his state. You know who created the wealth over the last year, where all the wealth is going?
It's in my district. I mean, Silicon Valley has done terrific over the pandemic. And I'm saying, why don't we tax some folks who have made millions of dollars with the digitization of the economy so we can help so many parts of this country, rural America, places that have been left behind, frankly, places in West Virginia that need investment in industrialization, in the new jobs, in child care. I think Senator Manchin and I, if we sat down, could come to an agreement. This is about economic growth. It's about opportunity in the 21st Century. And we don't believe that just having tax cuts and overseas wars is the way to get there.
It -- just in the House, in your body the House moderates were saying, look, give us a vote this past week on infrastructure and we will support -- we will negotiate, but we will support a social spending plan, and you progressives wouldn't trust them. Why not? We agreed to do what Joe Biden wants. You know I chaired Bernie Sanders's campaign. Medicare for All isn't in here. Free college isn't in here. Congressman, time out here. First on Monday, then on Thursday. And she said to them, I'm going to give it to you, and you and the Progressive Caucus refused to give it to them.
Why didn't you trust them that if you passed their plan they would vote for your plan? Chris, I didn't get one call from the White House saying that we want the infrastructure bill to pass first. The reality is 95 percent of the party has been with President Biden.
He wants both bills. In AugustFox News Sunday began to be produced in high definition. The first minute or so of the broadcast runs down the day's headlines, since Fox, fox news sunday today youtube the Big Three television networksdoes not have a conventional national morning news program that leads into Fox News Sunday, though a limited amount of Fox's affiliates have local news programs leading into it. For the rest of the first half of the show, Wallace interviews news makers from the prior week. During the second half of the show, Wallace introduces a panel of four pundits to speak about the political impact of the news.
Fox news sunday today youtube Video
Former Fox News reporter reacts to Tucker Carlson seriesFox news sunday today youtube - have hit
..
What level do Yokais evolve at? - Yo-kai Aradrama Message
Zuluzilkree